Let's just assume that the Pegasus week ended/started at noon today.
Jay Rosen Q&A with Bill Grueskin, Managing Editor of WSJ Online.
I was very interested to see the oft-misuse of the "Information wants to be free" quote:
Bill Grueskin: Well, information wants to be free, as the saying goes. But the saying goes further than that, it turns out.
Here's the whole quote, from Stewart Brand's book, The Media Lab: Inventing the Future at MIT :
Information wants to be free. Information also wants to be expensive. Information wants to be free because it has become so cheap to distribute, copy, and recombine---too cheap to meter. It wants to be expensive because it can be immeasurably valuable to the recipient. That tension will not go away. It leads to endless wrenching debate about price, copyright, 'intellectual property', the moral rightness of casual distribution, because each round of new devices makes the tension worse, not better.
And support of one of our core beliefs:
Any newspaper Web site that limits itself to repurposing content from the paper is in serious trouble. Any newspaper site that fails to recognize the value of the paper's brand and content is in serious trouble. So there you have it. I'm firmly and unequivocally ambivalent about this.
Some caution:
Now, though, the Internet is doing to print what TV and radio threatened to do, but could never pull off. And journalists who fail to see this ought to be writing their career obituaries rather than their stories, because their readers are changing faster than newspapers are.
Which gets back to the first point. What sort of readers do you want? There are millions of people who will not and cannot replace their print reading with an online news source. Supplement, yes; replace, no.
Then there is the online audience that brings a different set of expectations. It is not entirely different; if so, the AIG and Wal-Mart stories wouldn’t have been at or near the top of our most-read list that Friday. But it’s different enough so you have to understand their needs and anticipate their desires.
And on the lack of recognition of Craig?
Objects may be closer than they appear.
Comments