Is Google going to bribe you with free Wi-Fi in order to get enough info to go behavioral?
Could have huge advertising ramifications.
But they still won't be able to do local well.
« My podcasting tipping point | Main | For those who don't yet get our ad model... »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834559a8669e200d8349bfc7069e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Googlezon GoogleNet arming for battle?:
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
| 31 |
Wonder why they won't be able to do local well?
Posted by: Alexander Muse | August 15, 2005 at 03:43 PM
Mainly because they are an aggregator, which means that they can only supply what is already out there. Local, and hyperlocal by extension, are sorely underrepresented. And even if they weren't, Google's still a ways off from being able to do behavioral as opposed to contextual. Even once they can, at the scale they're operating at, the signal-to-noise ratio at the local level is incredibly low.
Finally, and most importantly, they don't have feet on the street, which is an essential necessary evil in reaching local advertisers.
But even saying they'll go behavioral may be giving too much credit: That presumes registration for search, which means that any number of companies could catch up very quickly.
But then, those Google cats are pretty smart. And they got lots o' powder...
Posted by: Mike Orren | August 15, 2005 at 10:08 PM